3 February 10

Belief-o-matic

This was fun, if pointless. Breaking news, everyone! I’m a humanist!
You know I mean it when Scientology comes before Catholicism hahaha.

You can take the Belief-o-Matic™ quiz, too. These are my results:

1. Secular Humanism (100%)
2. Unitarian Universalism (95%)
3. Liberal Quakers (86%)
4. Theravada Buddhism (83%)
5. Nontheist (73%)
6. Neo-Pagan (68%)
7. Taoism (65%)
8. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (62%)
9. Mahayana Buddhism (54%)
10. Orthodox Quaker (53%)
11. New Age (51%)
12. Reform Judaism (46%)
13. Jainism (41%)
14. Sikhism (37%)
15. Baha’i Faith (35%)
16. Scientology (31%)
17. Hinduism (29%)
18. New Thought (29%)
19. Seventh Day Adventist (28%)
20. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (25%)
21. Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (22%)
22. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (19%)
23. Eastern Orthodox (16%)
24. Islam (16%)
25. Orthodox Judaism (16%)
26. Roman Catholic (16%)
27. Jehovah’s Witness (9%)

“Warning: Belief-O-Matic™ assumes no legal liability for the ultimate fate of your soul.”

29 January 10

Two of my least favourite things in one.

One thing I despise more than most anything else is censorship. Another thing I hate more than most anything else is when a bunch of fat old men sit around in a Governmental Building and decide things for women. I come to expect things like this from certain countries… but Australia? Really?

The Australian Classification board (ACB) is banning depictions of women with A-cup breasts in adult media (note: this is not limited to porn) as well as any depictions of female ejaculation.

If you’re going “ew gross ejaculation” right now, then grow up for a second to realize that this issue goes far beyond people not being able to see as much porn. That is not what I care about.

First, on the matter of censoring women with small breasts. I don’t even want to use the word ’small’ here, because an A-cup is a very average breast size, especially if you are of a thin or athletic build, but to avoid redundancy in saying ‘women with A-cups’ over and over again, I will say small. In any case, the “logic” behind this censorship is that showing a small-breasted woman nude in a film, in porn, or in photography (pornographic or artistic) that is available online might encourage child pornography or pedophilia. Of course censoring nude images of minors is the right thing to do, but this is not what is being done. What is being done is adults are being censored because their breast size makes them supposedly look underage because their breasts look “underdeveloped.” If you want to protect the children, Australia, why aren’t you taking down photos of women who actually are under 18 instead of women who you deem appear under 18?

And all this done without a single thought of what this implies for a woman’s body image. Women, at large, are not very body-confident as it is, and many who do have small breasts already feel inadequate (men, it’s probably like a watered down version of your dick-anxiety). This censorship is sending the message, “if you wear an A-cup, you are underdeveloped and no one should or wants to look at nude photos of you.” It’s also a fact that many people actually prefer smaller breasts to larger ones. What message is this sending to those men and women? That they are pedophiles?

The worst of this is now small-breasted women who take nude photos of themselves can be charged with simulated child pornography. So women with certain body types cannot take a photograph. Tell me this isn’t discrimination, or violation of basic human rights.

Now we come to the matter of censoring female ejaculation. Why, why, why is it okay to distribute porn of men ejaculating all over the place, but not women? Because they think it’s pee and it’s gross, says the ACB. Actually, the word they used was ‘abhorrent’. Listen, ACB. You never, ever say that a natural thing that happens to a woman’s body is ‘abhorrent’. Ever. Unless you want to be seen as some prude, misogynistic, Victorian asshole. Secondly, the level of sexual education on this board frankly terrifies me. Do they not have wives? Are they all gay? Female ejaculation is not urine. Full stop. It is more or less the same deal as male ejaculation, except there is obviously no reproductive matter involved (which is why many churches would call this ‘abhorrent’…ugh), and while some women can experience it most of the time, some women never do. Censoring this is on par with saying women should not be allowed to orgasm, or that they can’t, or that it is wrong. I am ready to claw the face off of anyone who says this to me. Not even kidding, ACB.

Censoring is bad enough to begin with, but when you start to mess with women’s body image and sexuality with it… well, that takes balls. Literally. This had better change soon.

18 January 10

Recipe: Lemony chickpea & tofu stirfry

It’s become a bit of a tradition by now that every time I visit Andrew (or the other way around), we try out some sort of recipe. This time I combined together two recipes and made some modifications. The result was incredibly delicious and probably healthy! I don’t have any photos but it doesn’t look like much of anything special. Try it! It is vegan. It made my omnivorous boyfriend happy, and it made my tofu-picky self happy. Everyone wins!

Lemony Chickpea & Tofu Stirfry

Step one: Tofu marinade:
1 package of extra firm tofu (16 oz, usually)
1 lemon
lemon juice (about 2-3tbs… I eyeball it)
olive oil (about 2tbs)
rosemary
3 cloves of garlic
Salt &pepper

1. Cut the tofu into relatively thin slices and drain (if you don’t know how to do this, google it. It’s not as hard as you might think. Also, if you think you don’t like tofu, I promise you actually do. Cut it relatively thin if you want to avoid tofu-y sponginess. It ends up tasting like crispy bits of lemon marinade flavour. Mmm).

2. Mince the garlic and cut the lemon in half and then into thin slices.

3. In a ziploc bag, mix together the garlic, lemon slices & juice, oil and spices.

4. Cut the drained tofu into small squares and add to the marinade. Let sit in the fridge for at least half an hour.

Step two: How to make the stirfry:
Olive oil
Sea salt
3 green onions (or 1 small onion)
1 cup canned chickpeas, drained
1 cup chopped cabbage
2 small zucchinis, chopped
Tofu & marinade from above recipe

1. Heat oil and salt in a pan. Add the tofu (setting the marinade aside and tossing out the lemon slices) and chickpeas.  Saute until the chickpeas are deeply golden and crispy, and the tofu is well-cooked and brown (it’ll take a while).

2. Add the chopped green onions and sauté for about 2 minutes before adding the cabbage. Cook for about another 2 minutes.

3. Remove everything from the pan onto a large plate and set aside.

4. In the same pan, add more oil and the zucchini.  Saute until it starts to take on a bit of color, around two or three minutes.

5. Add the chickpea mixture along with the lemon marinade that was set aside and sauté for a few minutes more. Add salt, pepper, and more lemon juice to taste.

6. Nom it.

Upon googling ways to drain tofu myself, I can’t really find any that seem useful enough to link to… so, in the next few days I will make a post about how to prepare tofu! With photos! Stay tuned.

12 January 10

Dane Cook goes to heaven

While googling a video I saw in video game class today of the first video game ever made to show Andrew, I came up with an atheist documentary that I decided I’d watch since it’s by the BBC and the BBC does some excellent, intelligent stuff (also, Arthur Miller and Richard Dawkins were in the first 3 minutes: always a good sign). On the sidebar of related videos, a Dane Cook video was linked. It’s called “Atheist”. I had no idea if Dane Cook is religious or not, but the fact stands that I’ve never been a Dane Cook fan. He’s not awful, and certainly better than most comedians, but I never understood the hype around him.

Anyway here is the video:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/887160/dane_cook_atheist/ (I’m having trouble embedding; sorry… although this way you can read the comments, which are entertaining).

Any respect I had for Dane Cook has vanished. Not because he disagrees with my (lack of) religious beliefs. But, wow, this was bordering on a little offensive. I know it’s a joke, but did you hear those people cheering and whistling when Dane says he’ll print the Bible on the atheist? The fact that that reaction happened is fucking terrifying. Look how smug he is. That audience actually wants me dead and turned into a book. I could have shrugged this off as being a joke if it wasn’t for that audience, but now here I am blogging about it. And if you don’t think it’s scary and offensive, replace “atheist” with “muslim” or “jew” and then tell me it’s just a harmless joke.

As well, Dane Cook, I have met many, many, many religious people who are as arrogant and condescending as you portrayed the atheist. But I have not met one atheist who was that way, nor do I know of an atheist who would talk down to someone who does believe in a god in that way (it doesn’t count when an atheist gets up in arms about religious people for the oppression of women, being against contraception, against gay marriage, etc. That is when it is good to call out religious nonsense. Also not counted here are punky 15 year olds who think “atheist” means “rebellious”). Also, atheists do not believe we become trees… sorry to ruin your punchline, man.

And, come on. Floating up into the sky and meeting your ancestors like you’re at an airport is more likely than… being dead? Silly Dane Cook. Questioning your beliefs is the best thing you can do. Why hold beliefs if you are afraid of having them questioned? They must not be very sound beliefs. Anyway, if Yahweh happens to exist, at least I won’t be in heaven and have to put up with Dane Cook laughing at his own jokes.

Here is a link to The Friendly Atheist so that you can read about how we’re not immoral, condescending, oppressive jerks. Give it a look even if you’re really positive whatever personal god you believe in exists — there’s lots of very good human rights type stuff, too, that anyone should be interested in.

Hoo boy, a post on mental disorders and now one on my atheism! Judge me, people. I can take it.

11 January 10

Mentally interesting

It happened a little over a week ago, but in case you didn’t hear, China executed a man named Akmal Shaikh due to charges of drug trafficking.

This isn’t going to be a blog post about the death penalty or China’s sketchy laws and politics (if you feel like you need to know, I’m against the death penalty, but for sadistic reasons: spending your life in prison is about a hundred times worse than just dying and being through with it [since hell isn't real, in case you didn't know that, either]). What really disturbs me about the happenings of this event is the fact that Shaikh was seriously mentally ill, and no one bothered to do anything about it.

Shaikh was held in custody in China for about 2 years after he was convicted of drug smuggling — a whole pile of heroin. Despite numerous claims that he was tricked into carrying the drugs into the country, China denied that he had any sort of recorded mental disorder.

Whether or not a mental disorder was recorded, you’d think at least one person would look into getting him assessed to see if there was one to record in the two years he spent in Chinese prison. Wouldn’t you? His family kept asserting that he was suffering from very serious bipolar disorder. That really, really should have set off a red flag for someone. But it didn’t, and no one bothered to get him assessed, and now a sick man is dead for something he did not mean to do, and was in no way in control of doing.

It’s not just China. This happens a lot. In British Columbia, 2 years ago, a bipolar man off his meds was shot 8 times by a cop. And the cop didn’t get charged because there was “insufficient evidence that excessive force was used.” What?? Okay, the man was obviously in a psychotic, manic state: he was trying to attack the officer with a hammer. But there are ways to disarm people. You tase him, you shoot him in the knees, but you don’t shoot him eight times, especially when you’ve seem him talking to a hammer and can tell he is obviously not in his normal state of mind.

Likely it is difficult, if you are a mentally healthy person, to understand how anyone could possibly be tricked into smuggling 4kg of heroin into China, or how anyone could be delusional enough to attack police officers with a hammer. That’s what this blog post is about — the general public understands shockingly little about mental illness. I know so many people who think schizophrenia means that someone just has voices in their head (and many find this hilarious, somehow; I must have missed the joke), or think that when someone is bipolar it means they have two personalities (or when bipolar disorder is referred to as manic depression, that it means someone is just very, very depressed). This couldn’t be farther from the truth. Schizophrenia is so complex and unique for each person that I cannot even begin to describe it. Bipolar disorder comes in many flavours and intensities, too, but the general idea is that a person with bipolar disorder suffers intense, random mood swings, from incredibly depressed to incredibly manic (which can be I’m-gonna-stay-up-for-a-week-and-drive-across-Canada kind of crazy, or I’m-afraid-of-everything kind of crazy, mostly) and everything in between.

It also might seem difficult to picture people who had to be murdered by police officers and lethal injection being as their families describe them: absolutely normal most of the time. But, millions of people have bipolar disorder. You probably know someone that does. In fact, you do know someone, because I’m bipolar. Mind, I don’t have it nearly as bad as most people, since I am type 2 (that’s right, we have types), or as I like to call it, Manic Depression: Bronze Edition™. While I do carry around a small pharmacy in my stomach, do that utterly-depressed thing from time to time (we bronze types tend to keep to the depressed side and save the real crazy mania for the type ones), sometimes don’t sleep for a week and have a handful of irrational paranoias, I’m generally more eccentric than crazy. You probably never noticed that I’m technically crazy.

The men in these news stories were clearly very manic, going through psychotic episodes. The scary part is that while I’ve never been psychotic, I know exactly how irrationally paranoid the man from BC must have been. My mania manifests itself as intense anxiety, like many other BP2s. He did not mean to attack those police officers, and that is what makes events like this so tragic.

There is a lot of stigma attached to being mentally interesting (as I like to call it) and not much is being done to combat the stigma. Worse is the widespread ignorance about mental illness. And the ignorance is probably not your fault. I don’t remember learning very much at all about bipolar disorder or anything else beyond “teenage feelings” in grade school. In fact, I didn’t know what bipolar disorder really was until I was diagnosed, and that was only a year and a half ago.

What I ask of you is to learn a little bit about mental illness, so maybe tragedies like what befell these two people (and many others) will happen much less frequently. Someone will be absolutely grateful to you for it. I will be. It is important to understand that it’s a disease, like having diabetes or asthma. You can’t get rid of it by thinking positively, and it will only get worse if you ignore it, much like a broken leg would. Just like a diabetic can’t snap into a mindset to get his or her sugar level back to normal, a bipolar person can’t just shake off the depression or come down from the mania.

Be careful of carelessly using mental illnesses to describe unrelated things. Think about it before you laugh at how “OCD” you are because you carry hand sanitizer around, or say that someone is “anorexic” because they are skinny (newsflash: you don’t decide to be anorexic, guys; it’s a disease, too, one that is extremely difficult to recover from). Don’t call someone who changes their mind frequently “bipolar”. I’m actually pretty decisive, you know. And whatever you do, never call anyone “schizo”. You have no idea what a terrible disease schizophrenia is to have until you have met someone who really has it. Even though I know no harm is often meant by it, I feel a sting any time anyone says things like this. It’s just as bad as “ugh, that movie was so gay” and “that test totally raped me.”

Someone, someday, will be extremely happy that you know some real facts about mental illness. Because the stigma is very real, and it’s incredibly difficult to tell people you have something like bipolar disorder. I’m trying pretty hard to be “out” about it (clearly). Most of the time they won’t believe you (the “think positive and it’ll go away” or the “it’s just a phase,” etc.), or they’ll think you are crazy and might kill them in their sleep because they are misinformed. But sometimes, someone actually understands and accepts it, and it is such a relief. You can be that person for someone.